Feb 08

Many parents believe that the purchase of a baby changing table is unnecessary. I must admit that at one time I considered them to be optional. I had them tagged and filed as the first piece of baby furniture to discard if the nursery became crowded. However, soon after my second baby was born, I reassessed the situation and realized that I may have been wrong to discount the advantages of a changing table.

With my first baby, the crib was my chosen spot for baby cleanup. For spur of the moment changes the nursery rug might be called into play if I was in a pinch. By the time baby number two showed up, the wear and tear on this mommy’s lower back began to show up. I could see the need for some relief from leaning over the crib rails to deal with a squirming infant. The time had come to reconsider my opinion as to whether or not a baby changing table was worth the sacrifice of space in the nursery.

I made the trip to the baby center for a test run to help me make the decision whether or not to invest my money in a changing table that I had earmarked for a baby armoire. I was ever so pleasantly surprised to find that I didn’t have to scrap my plans for a baby armoire completely. I found baby changing tables that are convertible into an armoire. Could it be that there would be more benefits to the purchase of a changing than the cure of my back ache?

In my mind, the storage capabilities of a changing table were limited to a few baby toiletries. Imagine my surprise when I found that along with providing a great surface for changing baby, there would be loads of storage space. All the drawers and stackable units that I could purchase as I needed were making inroads into tearing down my staunch resistance to this particular piece of baby furniture.

What ultimately convinced me to break down, write the check and load the baby changing table in the SUV was finding a piece in cherry that was a perfect match for the style of our home’s nursery. Whether or not this handy piece of baby furniture will have an effect on my tired back or not is yet to be seen. It’s really too soon to tell, but even if my back continues to ache, I’m still happy with all the storage and the looks of the changing table.

The combination of Jan Bay’s love of interior decorating and child rearing motivated the building of her site, Unique Baby Gear Ideas which features numerous articles on nursery design, reviews of modern baby gear and the creation of modern nurseries for babies

Use of this article requires an active link to Unique Baby Gear Ideas, Nursery Themes and Decorating Ideas

Friends Link : Corpuschristi Absolutebestorg Tw Czech Sex Furniture http://bankruptcy.diggyblog.com/ http://microphonessblog.co.cc/


Feb 04

People resist change.This statement can be a reassuring conversation starter for managers who have struggled with implementing change. However, the conversation does not have to end on the same note. In personal and professional decisions, people make bold and daring changes daily.

Experts suggest that one of the most difficult changes in life is for a family to be separated (Martin, James, et al, 2000; Bryceson and Vuorela, 2003). Yet in 2005 alone, 1.8 million high school graduates left parents and other family members to attend college (Bureau of Labor Statistics). About the same number of students will be admitted to colleges throughout the US this year. Most of these young adults have never lived by themselves before, and for those who have siblings, have never lived away from them. Parents who guide, support, and facilitate the enrollment of their children in college do so knowing full well they will be separated from a dear friend, helper, and confidant; and that their life’s savings will be depleted in the process. Many are not deterred by the prospect of an empty nest.

Another report released in August by BLS shows that the youngest baby boomers, those born between 1957 and 1964, held an average of 10.5 jobs from ages 18 to 40. This is a surprisingly significant number for a generation that is famed to relish stability. The number is expected to be higher for subsequent generations. In addition, some of these career moves involve relocating to new and unfamiliar territories.

Considering the disruption to the family, including the emotional toll and financial impact, why would a parent approve of and even invest in this separation from a child? Or why would people embrace the uncertainty of a different job or a new location? An insight into why people make these decisions is helpful in enabling them to embrace organizational change.

The power of a promise. The ultimate goal of attending college might be to earn a degree. However, the promise of higher education-access to specialized knowledge, foundation for a life dream, chance at a brighter future, etc.-is priceless! It’s powerful enough to cause parents and children to not only embrace change but to initiate it.

A promise is a powerful motivator to those for whom it holds meaning. The promise of every organization is its vision. An organization is unlikely to succeed if investors, employees, and customers do not share its vision. Employees who already believe in and espouse a vision have a strong reason to make changes to actualize the vision. Thus, beyond outlining the short- and long-term goals of a change initiative, organizations should demonstrate how the change reinforces a shared vision.

The draw of trust. Parents might be unwilling to pay for a college education if they do not trust their child to commit to earning a degree. They can come to this conclusion if the child has a history of truancy, failing to complete homework, and repeating grade levels.

Similarly, employees will be hesitant to embrace change if

they believe management has an ulterior motive; some stakeholders will benefit to the detriment of others; the organization appears unsure of its purpose or direction; or previous change initiatives did not yield desired results. Trust is an important lubricant for the change process. It minimizes the friction that would otherwise result from strong or persistent resistance. In a trusting environment, employees are likely to accept a clear, honest, and rational explanation from management for any of the above concerns. However, in an environment in which trust has been breached, such an explanation will have to be backed by a series of consistent actions to be credible.

The benefit of early warning. The personal examples being used may be criticized for representing predictable change. For instance, a person who desires to have a college-educated child can start planning even before the child is conceived. However, there are decipherable symptoms for change that are outside of one’s control. Organizations that carefully analyze consumer trends, economic indicators, government regulations, the actions of competitors, to name a few data sources, are able to effectively predict the locus and direction of change. The automobile industry had decades to address concerns about fuel efficiency and alternative energy sources. Toyota and Honda took the early warnings seriously and led the industry in responding. Both companies have profited greatly.

Information is power; therefore, promptly sharing trend analysis and possible implications with employees enables them to take necessary preparatory steps. Valuable time-to research trends, digest personal impact, upgrade skills, adjust psychologically, etc.-is lost if information is shared only at the eleventh hour. Moreover, willingness to share data that inform strategic decisions demonstrates trust in the workforce.

The reward of innovation. Change is a great force, and people who initiate it do so to accomplish their purposes. Others play by the change initiator’s rules. People can deal with change in three ways:

Wait and let change happen (reactionary approach) Prepare for change (proactive approach) Create change (innovative approach) Organizations that frequently react to change have a future in the annals of failed ventures. Proactive entities are not completely caught off guard. Sometimes an organization can only anticipate and prepare for change that’s outside its control. However, innovative and forward-thinking organizations have the ability to create change and set rules by which their industry conducts business. In the process, they gobble up market share and keep the competition in the rearview mirror. What’s more, they eliminate the uncertainty and resultant anxiety that often accompany change that’s initiated or driven by others.

Honda did just that when it created demand for fashionable motorcycles in the early 1980s. In an eighteen-month period, between 1981 and 1983, the company introduced or replaced 113 models, turning over its entire product line twice! Its goal was to make motorcycle design a matter of fashion. It succeeded at making style, newness, and freshness important attributes to customers. Next to a Honda, Yamaha’s bikes, the competition, looked bland and old. Consequently, Yamaha was left with twelve months of unsold inventory (Stalk and Hout, 1990).

The leverage of personal impact. Before an individual accepts a new job, he or she would, at a minimum, want to know the type of work, where it’s located, whether it’s full time or part time, if travel is required, whether weekend work is involved, what benefits are included, and how much it pays. The individual might decline the job if he or she resents traveling and the job requires it.

The job seeker cannot make any of these decisions if the prospective employer is not clear about the offer. More important, the employer can modify the offer to land the right candidate.

A question that management must anticipate and answer in advance is: How will a proposed change affect each employee? Will it require new skills, lead to increased or reduced responsibility, loss or increase in authority, or lower or higher pay? Ultimately, will it result in a job loss?

Identifying the impact of change in advance demonstrates that an organization values its employees enough to anticipate how they might be affected. What the organization does with this information, including how it delivers it, especially if the impact is adverse, is just as germane. By treating workers in a caring and respectful manner, an organization assists them in dealing with the impact of change. For instance, sincere appreciation and respect for employees to be laid off can be demonstrated by providing adequate advance notice, counseling, outplacement service, severance pay, and references. Through these actions, the organization invests in its reputation and ability to make difficult changes in the future.

The value of a facilitative environment. Just as succeeding at college might be difficult for a student encumbered with artificial barriers-parents assigning other work to the student during school hours, insisting on excellent grades but failing to purchase required books, or withholding financial support as discipline for action or behavior unrelated to schooling-embarking on a change initiative can be excruciating in an environment fraught with inconsistent messages.

To avoid the dilemma of having to implement change in a contradictory environment, employees put up walls of resistance. Resistance in this environment may surpass indifference and passive-aggressiveness to include subversive behavior and sabotage. Organizations can avoid this situation by carefully analyzing the work environment and eliminating or mitigating barriers. A force-field analysis, which identifies the forces that support and oppose change, is a good place to start.

People change. They often initiate and embrace change. While the above recommendations are not exhaustive, carefully implementing them will have a positive impact on the response of your workforce to change. Before you begin, take a moment to appreciate how much your organization has already changed. In fact, your organization didn’t really change; people did. And people changed your organization. Openly acknowledge their past efforts.

Endnotes

Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. College Enrollment and Work Activity of 2005 High School Graduates. March 24, 2006. Retrieved August 27, 2006.

Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. Number of Jobs held, Labor Market Activity, and Earnings Growth among the Youngest Baby Boomers: Results from a Longitudinal Survey. August 25, 2006. Retrieved August 27, 2006.

Deborah (EDT) Bryceson, Ulla (EDT) Vuorela. The Transnational Family: New European Frontiers and Global Networks. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers, 2003.

George Stalk, Jr., Tom Hout. Competing Against Time: How Time-based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets. New York: The Free Press, 1990.

James A. Martin, et al. The Military Family: A Practice Guide for Human Service Providers. CT: Praeger/Greenwood, 2000.

Recommend : Aonline Shop 2 Boise http://maximizeroblogs.co.cc/ http://antiagingblogs.co.cc/ Christmas Gift Idea


Jan 29

When you’re setting about to launch a major change effort in your organization there are many things you must do but none are bigger than the one key ingredient to driving change in any organization of any size. What is it you say? Let me tell you a brief story.

One time awhile back I was having dinner with the CEO of a $500 million tech company. We were discussing the changes he was trying to drive and how I might help. He went in to great detail all the things he was doing and how if he could sustain the efforts it would change the company. Then he turned and asked, “People just don’t get behind it. What is the key to driving these changes?”

We all know that is the question of the century. I turned and said, “You!”

He was puzzled as all leaders are when confronted with the reality that what they want to happened and what does happen are too often two very different things. As you can imagine the CEO was shocked and more than intrigued. I told him the one key fundamental truth of change. If the highest ranking person, the one over all the parts of the organization impacted by the changes, blinks during the change effort it will fail.

What I explained to him was that his Lieutenants, his direct reports, were smiling to his face and going out preaching change to anyone but their own organizations. His sales VP was the worst. Everyone else needed to change but by gummy his organization ‘always delivered’ and didn’t need all this stuff. Oh he told the CEO, his buddy by the way, that he was playing the change game but his actions proved different.

I told the CEO that when driving change you have to follow a simple process. If you are the Big Kahuna in charge of the areas of the organization being changed then you need to follow these steps …

1. Get real about what you want to accomplish with the change.

2. Count the cost both financially and with your people and only then decide to make the changes. Once you know the cost then you apply the nomoreBS philosophy and look in the mirror and seriously decide whether you are willing to pay the price. If you are then commission the work.

3. Commission the work after deciding the hard part, number two above.

In the case of this CEO he had already embarked on his change journey. His VP of Sales was a major roadblock to the change effort. I told him that if he was serious about the changes then he’d have to confront his sales guy and friend. Ideally you would make this decision ahead of time, before investing millions in change.

You see the decision you have to make if you are the key leader of change is what to do if my key people resist. You have to decide, that after all due diligence, if my best person stands in the way will I terminate them? If you are unwilling to do that then don’t embark on this change effort. You will fail guaranteed. More change projects fail, not from middle management dragging their feet, but from the senior team being duplicitous and lying to the big guy. It happens all over the place and we see it everyday.

When you decide to launch your next big change effort, make sure you have considered the cost … not just he financial cost but the people cost. If you are unwilling to pay it then save your money, the aggravation and stay like you are today. You’ll be far better off. Sometimes the valor of your decisions is found in what you don’t do as much as what you do.

Ed Kugler has been living change since the jungles of Vietnam where he was a Marine Sniper for two-years in the Vietnam War. He came home to a country he hadn’t left and began work as a mechanic and truck driver. Since then he has worked his way into the executive suite of Frito Lay, Pepsi Cola and Compaq Computer where he was Vice President of Worldwide Logistics, a position he achieved with no college degree. Ed left in 1997 to consult and write. He is the author of Dead Center – A Marine Sniper’s Two Year Odyssey in the Vietnam War and five other books and counting. He regularly consults with some o the nations leading companies on organizational change and coaches individuals to make the most of their lives. Ed is the father of three, grandfather to three and has been married to the same woman for 38 years and counting.

http://www.nomorebs.com
http://www.edkugler.com

See Also : Store Amazon2 Shop 7 Flintshire